Document Type

Article

Department

​Economics

Publication Date

8-2024

Abstract

We study gender differences in a taking-framed dictator game. We expand on past studies documenting gender differences in the taking-framed dictator game by asking whether gender differences persist when endowments are earned. We find a strong and robust gender effect. Women take less than men both in terms of overall amounts and share taken. We further elicit emotions following the taking game. Shame is positively correlated with taking behavior; this could be a contributing factor to taking aversion documented in the literature. Interestingly we do not observe gender differences in reported emotions or emotional intensity by either dictators or receivers.

Comments

Author's post-print manuscript. Published available:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2024.102207

Publication Title

Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics

Volume

111

DOI

10.1016/j.socec.2024.102207

Download

Included in

Economics Commons

Share

COinS