Document Type
Article
Department
Political Science
Publication Date
3-2019
Abstract
While international relations scholars make many claims about violence, they rarely define the concept. This article develops a typology of three distinct kinds of violence: direct, indirect, and pacification. Direct violence occurs when a person or agent inflicts harm on another. Indirect violence manifests through the structures of society. We propose a third understanding of violence: pacification. Using a phenomenological methodology, and drawing on anarchist and postcolonial thought, we show that the violence of pacification is diffuse, inconspicuous, intersubjective, and structured into the fabric of society. This understanding of violence matters for the study of international relations in general and research on the liberal peace in particular. We argue that the spread of liberal institutions does not necessarily decrease violence but instead transforms it. Our phenomenological analysis captures empirical trends in human domination and suffering that liberal peace theories cannot account for. It reveals how a decline in direct violence may coincide with the transformation of violence in ways that are concealed, monopolized, and structured into the liberal order. We call this process liberal pacification.
Publication Title
Liberal Pacification and the Phenomenology of Violence
Volume
63
Issue
1
First Page
199
Last Page
212
DOI
10.1093/isq/sqy060
Comments
Published under Open Access terms as:
Ilan Baron, Jonathan Havercroft, Isaac Kamola, Jonneke Koomen, Justin Murphy & Alex Prichard. “Liberal Pacification and the Phenomenology of Violence.” International Studies Quarterly 63, no. 1 (March 2019): 199-212.